home
join about login
from
Cemiterio de navios / Ship cemetery

gst

Jan. 16, 2019, 8:45 p.m.

on Cemiterio de navios / Ship cemetery

No dia 10 de julho, um domingo, ele foi avistado passando pela cidade de Mostardas rumando para o sul.
Na época, um navio moderno e luxuoso, um grande número de pessoas, apesar do mau tempo, se reuniu na praia do Cassino para ver a chegada do navio na manhã da segunda-feira, 11 de julho.

Vinha contornando a costa a uma distância razoável, tendo em vista a forte rebentação que se fazia a três milhas fora dos bancos de areia e chegou à barra por volta das duas da tarde do dia 11. O tempo estava escuro, mas não a ponto de não ser avistado. Assim, a estação de praticagem o avistou uma hora e meia mais tarde, tendo sido mandado a seu encontro a lancha São Leopoldo, para que a praticagem soubesse de seu calado. Nesse ínterim, sobreveio forte cerração e o navio se perdeu de vista, tendo a lancha retornado ao seu ancoradouro na povoação da Barra. Depressões barométricas indicavam tempestade.

Às nove horas da noite, caiu um forte temporal, com o vento "carpinteiro" fortíssimo, soprando de SSE, e que se prolongaria até às duas horas da madrugada seguinte, vindo a se repetir com mais intensidade por volta das quatro horas da madrugada do dia 12 de julho. O navio, que estava aproximadamente quatro milhas para fora da barra, não resistiu à força da natureza e sucumbiu entre as ondas gigantes que o atacaram.

A tempestade daquele dia foi tão terrivel, que além do Rio Apa, quatro outros barcos viriam a naufragar.

Todos os cerca de 126 passageiros e tripulação perderam a vida. Foi o pior naufrágio da costa Gaúcha e foi um dos motivos que levaram a construção dos molhes na barra da lagoa dos Patos.

- parte do texto vem do wikipedia -
ps: o navio da foto nao é o Rio Apa, mas outro da mesma época, de comprimento e deslocamento semelhantes.

185 views origin
Southern California as Seen From Apollo 7 - Climate change: 'Hothouse Earth' risks even if CO2 emissions slas - Launching to Observe Our Sun - Wozniacki passes Barty test in Madrid, Sharapova advances - Fallece un exdiputado federal del PRI tiroteado este fin de seman - Federer pummels Bemelmans to move closer to top spot - Tonella - revisão do limpador de parabrisa do fusca - Celebrating 28 Years of the Hubble Space Telescope - Orion in Red and Blue - GLORIA GROOVE - SEDANAPO - NASA Awards Contract for Aerospace Systems Modeling, Simulation - Eclipse solar hoje! - Eu vi eu viiiii O papai noel tava na sinaleira - Los candidatos se disputan el poderoso voto del magisterio mexica - The Extraordinary Spiral in LL Pegasi - At Tranquility Base - Noel Guarany | Sem Fronteira (1975) [Álbum Completo/Full Album] - Trump quip about North Korea's Kim sparks outcry on social media - Slava Ukraini! on Steam - Pipi das Meias Altas Portuguese vol 1 - Austria plans tougher sentences for crimes against women - Hello. - Guri de Uruguaiana fala sobre hits do Carnaval e exageros no Phot - Newest Crew Launches for the International Space Station - amizades - Dieguito - A Lesma © ℗ MÚSICA AUTORAL Ensaio - NASA Awards Contract for Continued Operations of its Jet Propulsi - Major League Baseball notebook: Mariners deal for Colome, Span fr - This is how to train a cat :D How I Trained My Cat - Little Planet Soyuz - Exclusive: North Korea earned $200 million from banned exports, s - Cetus Galaxies and Supernova -  

tutti - social network

Tutti is the simplest social network on internet. Here you can make friends, create communities, sell things, make surveys, comment and share stuff.

Salve as Toninhas

Although it has been, and remains, a major challenge to obtain quantitative data for proper population assessment, there is reason to believe that the Franciscana is threatened throughout its range, and particularly in areas of intensive gillnet fishing. As stated in the IUCN cetacean action plan, the Franciscana "may be at greater risk of extinction than any other cetacean species in the western South Atlantic," and "the greatest immediate requirement" for its conservation is "to reduce levels of incidental mortality in gillnets" (Reeves et al. 2003). Simulations of the Rio Grande do Sul/Uruguay (hereafter RS/URU) subpopulation using a plausible range of assumed rates of increase and an estimated removal rate based on available abundance and bycatch data suggest a decline over three generations of close to 50%, which would meet the decline threshold for EN under criterion A. The suspected reduction in population size and its causes may not have ceased (subcriterion A2), based on actual or potential levels of exploitation (in the form of bycatch) (subcriterion d under A1). Two other lines of evidence (indices) can be interpreted as corroborative of a marked decline in abundance of this subpopulation: (1) a decline of approximately 71% in the bycatch of franciscanas per unit of fishing effort was reported in Uruguay from the 1960s to 1980s; and (2) stranding rates of franciscanas in southern Brazil decreased by nearly 70% between the 1970s and 1990s. The Cetacean Specialist Group, having reviewed the data and analyses presented by the assessors (and see Secchi and Wang 2002), was reluctant to recommend EN status at this time (May 2003). Instead, it was agreed to recommend VU status, on the understanding that a reassessment and re-evaluation would be conducted in the near future, taking into account newly obtained data on abundance and bycatch, and perhaps treating the existing evidence with somewhat more elaborate statistical methods. Consultation and Peer Review: Information included as supporting documentation for this assessment was discussed with participants at the 4th Workshop for the Coordination of Research and Conservation of Franciscana in the Western South Atlantic (held in Porto Alegre, Brazil, in 2000). That group discussed progress on Franciscana research and expressed support for the need to change the IUCN Red List status of this species. This documentation was drafted principally by Eduardo Secchi and John Wang, and their work was edited and revised by Randall Reeves following extensive review by the membership of the Cetacean Specialist Group prior to submission to IUCN. For further details, see Secchi and Wang (2002).



http://www.iucnredlist.org/details/full/41761/0
more